Record at a Glance
- Category
- Jan 6th
- Age in NPR record
- 63
- Location
- Phoenix, Arizona
- Charges
- Seditious Conspiracy; Conspiracy to Obstruct an Official Proceeding; Obstruction of an Official Proceeding and Aiding and Abetting; Conspiracy to Prevent an Officer from Discharging Any Duties
- Case status
- Pleaded not guilty; Convicted; Sentenced
- Presidential action
- Commutation
- Current status
- The January 6 convictions were vacated in May 2026, and the indictment was dismissed with prejudice on August 4, 2026. The earlier trial and sentencing history is retained below.
Case Summary
Federal prosecutors allege that Edward Vallejo, along with other members of the anti-government group the Oath Keepers, committed seditious conspiracy by plotting to “oppose by force the lawful transfer of presidential power.” In December 2020, Vallejo was allegedly invited by Oath Keeper leader Stewart Rhodes to a Signal group chat titled “DC OP: Jan 6 21." Later that month, Vallejo allegedly wrote to Rhodes on Signal saying that he and others were coming to Washington, D.C., and that “everyone coming has their own technical equipment and knows how to use it,” with a winking emoji. In addition, court documents say, he said that the group would have both “rifles” and “man power.” Federal prosecutors claim that Vallejo was designated as part of an armed “quick reaction force” (QRF) stationed outside Washington but prepared to bring “heavy weapons” to the city. Two days before the riot, Vallejo messaged alleged co-conspirator Kelly Meggs saying that he was with the “cadre” in Tennessee and “requesting coordinates,” signing off, “For the Republic,” court documents indicate. He arrived in Virginia on Jan. 5, 2021, and was provided the address of the Comfort Inn in Ballston, where he and the rest of the QRF were given firearms and ammunition, according to court documents. On the morning of Jan. 6, 2021, Vallejo and others were reportedly waiting at the hotel for information from alleged co-conspirators on the ground. Court documents point to a podcast that Vallejo and another Arizona team member appeared on, where they talked about the possibility of “armed conflict” and “guerrilla war” and said, “there are people who are prepared, have the will, have the facilities to do more than taunt.” Later in the day, members of the Oath Keepers allegedly formed military-style stack formations as they breached the U.S. Capitol building. Prosecutors say Vallejo messaged the Signal chat more than once to assert his readiness to step in. Later that night, he was part of a group that included Rhodes that celebrated the attack at a restaurant and talked about how to continue fighting the presidential transition of power, according to court records. The next morning at 5:46 a.m., Vallejo allegedly told the Signal chat that he would “probe their defense line right now,” stating, “Departing for Recon now.” A few days later, an alleged co-conspirator from the Arizona QRF team reportedly wrote to Rhodes as they drove back to Arizona, “wanted to let you know that [Vallejo] and I are here. We are excited to learn next steps and would like to know what we should be doing right now.” Vallejo's attorney stated in federal court that he served in the U.S. Army in the 1970s and was stationed at Ft. Polk in Louisiana.
Case History
Vallejo pleaded Not Guilty to all charges. Jury trial held 12/6/2022-1/23/2023. He was found Guilty on all charges. Sentenced on 6/1/2023 to 36 months incarceration; 36 months of supervised release (including the first 12 months to be served on location monitoring); $400 special assessment. A proclamation commutes the sentence to time served as of January 20, 2025
Later Developments
2026-08-04 · federal criminal disposition
The district court dismissed the indictment with prejudice after the appellate court vacated the convictions on May 21, 2026.
Legal Status: Convictions vacated and indictment dismissed; this does not erase the historical trial record or establish the status of other matters.
- Development Source
United States v. Rhodes et al., No. 22-cr-15, memorandum opinion and order, August 4, 2026U.S. District Court for the District of Columbia, court filing via CourtListener2026-10-24
- Development Source
Sources
- Primary Documentation
NPR Jan. 6 Defendant DatabaseNPR - Primary Documentation
Underlying court recordCourt record linked by NPR
The original January 6 case summary, charges, procedural updates and image are drawn from the NPR archive snapshot dated 2026-09-25. Later developments are separately dated and sourced; they concern distinct proceedings and public events.